ISSN 1477-7029
First published in 2002

   


 

Business Journal of Business Research Methods - Go to Home Page

   

Paper 1 - Summary
   

Home Papers in this Issue Previous Issues Site Map

    .

Home
About the Journal
Scope
Editorial Board
Submission Guidelines
Call for Papers
Book Reviews


D
ownloadable documents on this site require Adobe Acrobat Reader (which you can download here - FREE)

ECRM: The European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies

Click for Information on ECKM 2003 Conference

Volume 4 Issue 1 November 2006

Getting the most from NUD*IST/NVivo
Dr. Alison Dean and Professor John Sharp
Kent Business School, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

   

The focus of this paper is on issues arising in the application of QSR NUD*IST and NVivo in management research.Since the most problematic areas in applying NUD*IST and NVivo are in using them for recording, collating, analysing and reporting interview data, this paper concentrates on the use of NUD*IST and NVivo for these purposes. This paper is not concerned with general problems of interviewing nor with technical details of how to use NUD*IST and NVivo but is about the practical problems of interpretation that can arise in applying NUD*IST and NVivo successfully to interview data and how the adoption of particular practices in qualitative data collection or different use of NUD*IST and NVivo can alleviate these problems. The paper examines problems that arise in the use of NUD*IST and NVivo at the different stages (Interviewing, Transcription, Structuring and Reporting) of three types of research project: a major research project, a specialist research project and a doctoral research project.

Problems may arise in interviewing (e.g., respondent motivation, organisational or cultural restraints, how to record non-verbal responses) leading to distortion, and in transcription (e.g., jargon, language and ‘translation’). These may be exacerbated by poor structuring and coding, leading to weak analysis and reporting. Suggestions are made as to how these problems can be avoided or mitigated. Conclusions are drawn about good practice in the use of NUD*IST and NVivo and suggestions are made on some enhancements that might be made to them. The paper argues that improved NUD*IST and NVivo practice along the lines indicated will lead to more transparent and consistent qualitative analysis which can be seen to conform to accepted standards of management research. Comments are also made about Interpretivism and the use of NUD*IST and NVivo and on the role of supervisors in doctoral research involving the use of NUD*IST and NVivo.

Keywords: Qualitative research reporting; CAQDAS; NUD*IST/NVivo good practice; interview transcription, coding and reporting; interpreting data

Download FULL PAPER

Back to Contents

Home Up Papers in this Issue Previous Issues Site Map

EJBRM is published by Academic Conferences International Limited
Curtis Farm, Kidmore End, Nr Reading RG4 9AY, England
Tel: +44 (0)1189 724148, Fax: +44 (0)1189 724691, Email: info@ejbrm.com

Website designed by www.itdesigners.com 

Send mail to jen@itdesigners.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2002-2005 Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods
Last modified: November 07, 2005
ISSN 1477-7029