ISSN 1477-7029
First published in 2002

   


 

Business Journal of Business Research Methods - Go to Home Page

   

Paper 12 - Summary
   

Home Papers in this Issue Previous Issues Site Map

    .

Home
About the Journal
Scope
Editorial Board
Submission Guidelines
Call for Papers
Book Reviews


D
ownloadable documents on this site require Adobe Acrobat Reader (which you can download here - FREE)

ECRM: The European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies

Click for Information on ECKM 2003 Conference

Volume 2 Issue 2 July 2004

Multi-perspective management research: Fusion or confusion?

Les Worrall, Wolverhampton Business School, Telford, UK (pp 163-170),
worrall@wbs.wlv.ac.uk

   

Management research is a very diffuse field. Some have argued that it needs to be able to clear the double hurdles of rigour and relevance. Some see management research as a ‘design science’ focusing on the development of technological rules while others would eschew any notion of the applicability of research findings to the practice of management. The variety of frameworks and stances available to underpin the conduct of management research make the selection of approaches potentially very difficult for experienced researchers and inexperienced researchers alike. The purpose of this paper is to discuss some of the issues affecting the conduct of a research project focusing specifically on the changing nature of managerial work from the perspective of a researcher who, until now, has adopted something of a positivistic stance: this researcher is now trying to develop a greater sense of reflexivity into his research. The paper first develops a framework in which management research can be located: it emphasises the different epistemological and ontological stances that can be taken. The paper then goes on to critique an approach based on an epistemological and ontological stance redolent of a positivistic approach this is oriented towards the product of a ‘single truth’ to discuss the possibility of conducting research using a framework that accepts the existence of multitudinous intangible, impressionistic, equally valid truths. The paper focuses on a programme of research into managerial work and the effect of organisational change on managerial work that has been in progress since the mid 1990s. The research so far has been highly empirical, has emphasised the collection and analysis of hard data and has led to the identification of a number of themes and issues. However, to reflect recent critiques of the epistemological and ontological basis of the field of work psychology, it was decided to develop a research strategy which would lead to the creation of narrative and text rather than numbers to explore if the issues raised in manager’s accounts of their lived experienced bore any resemblance to the image developed from the analysis of data generated through questionnaires.

Keywords: management research, multi-perspective, incommensurability, quantitative, qualitative

Download FULL PAPER

Return to Contents

Home Up Papers in this Issue Previous Issues Site Map

EJBRM is published by Academic Conferences International Limited
Curtis Farm, Kidmore End, Nr Reading RG4 9AY, England
Tel: +44 (0)1189 724148, Fax: +44 (0)1189 724691, Email: info@ejbrm.com

Website designed by www.itdesigners.com 

Send mail to jen@itdesigners.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2002-2005 Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods
Last modified: November 07, 2005
ISSN 1477-7029